Jul
03
2009
0

Countdown to Le Tour

One day to the start of Le Tour de France and it looks like QuickStep’s Boonen will get to race after all. Despite a positive drug test for cocaine, and the ASO decision to NOT let him ride in the tour, his appeal was granted. The Court of Arbitration for Sport of the French Olympic Committee (whoever THEY are) has decided he is in. So, the lesson is, if you break the rules but are very important to your team and your sponsors, it will be overlooked n’est ce pas? Remember last year’s theme song for Le Tour? Apparently, Boonen did not get the anti-drug message. 

The up side is, the tour will be more competitive with Boonen in the race and I’m all for that. The more competitors there are, hopefully, less coverage for Mr. I’m-retired-wait-no-I’m-not! Either way, Vive Le Tour!!!

Live coverage begins Saturday, July 4th 8:30 Eastern time on Versus. But DO NOT enter the Cervelo play to win sweepstakes. I’ve had my eye on that bike since  2003! Le vélo est à moi!

Written by amy in: cycling |
Jun
30
2009
2

prepare to be boarded

i can’t really blame the TPB guys for throwing in the towel — those crafty swedes been fighting the good fight for a long time, against some real heavies. what’s galling is this ludicrous, self-serving statement they’ve posted:

As all of you know, there’s not been much news on the site for the past two-three years. It’s the same site essentially. On the internets, stuff dies if it doesn’t evolve. We don’t want that to happen.

We’ve been working on this project for many years. It’s time to invite more people into the project, in a way that is secure and safe for everybody. We need that, or the site will die. And letting TPB die is the last thing that is allowed to happen!

heck yes! that would be a disaster. and inviting a for-profit corporation with plans “to introduce models which entail that content providers and copyright owners get paid for content” to the table sure sounds like a terrific way to foster innovation and maintain the vitality of the site. it’s how napster has managed to stay atop the technocultural-relevance heap all these years, after all. unless…

If the new owners will screw around with the site, nobody will keep using it. That’s the biggest insurance one can have that the site will be run in the way that we all want to.

mm hmm. maybe this is just me being cynical, but bear with me for a second. do you think maybe it’s possible that the new owners — whoever the fuck they are — don’t particularly want or expect the site to succeed? that a lot of very wealthy and powerful interests have already spent years and millions trying, precisely, to create a situation where “nobody will keep using it”? i’m not sayin’, i’m just sayin’: haven’t some unscrupulous characters been known, at times, to take out “insurance” on properties that then mysteriously burn down?

naaah! those guys would never intentionally mislead us in order to put a transparently cheerful spin on their total annihilation in court, and certainly not in adorable skwisgaar-like broken english. just look how excited they are about this great new opportunity:

TPB will have economical muscles to let people evolve it. It will team up with great technicians to evolve the protocols. And we, the people interested in more than just technology, will have the time to focus on that. It’s win-win-win.

… I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all. Don’t worry – be happy!

golly! i, for one, can’t wait.

Written by josh in: Uncategorized |
Jun
22
2009
0

Dr. Tran – 100% Ice

Written by charlie in: advertising |
Jun
22
2009
0

Iran

I’ve been glued to HuffPo all weekend watching their thread for the latest news. They’ve scooped CNN countless times. MSNBC continues to fail to cover the situation, instead showing episodes of some crappy docu-drama. If the dribble of verifiable information is correct, this should be the week Iran shuts down. If only we’d had the guts to come out into the streets against Bush in 2000, think what might not be happening now.

Written by charlie in: Iran | Tags: , ,
Jun
17
2009
0

Crickets on the lone prairie

It’s hotter than a sidewinder’s belly on the fourth of July round these parts and steamier than Old Faithful herself, but that doesn’t mean we’re not sucking in the news. I think the real problem is a rash of pregnant women among the SB writers, and those that remain, either lack real internet access or real posting gusto. That said, let’s call it “Summer Vacation.” See you soon!

Written by charlie in: throwaway posts |
May
11
2009
0

damn, obama, you funny

i can’t wait to read cheney’s memoir.

Written by josh in: Uncategorized |
Apr
13
2009
1

Somalia

There’s a really interesting post on MyDD that addresses some of the history in Somalia. It makes it quite clear that the residents of that area have every right to be seriously pissed off. Yet another instance of imperialist thought gone awry, and more dead bodies, the only foreseeable outcome. I wish I had more to comment, other than to say it seems like the current situation is surely going to be repeated.

Written by charlie in: Uncategorized | Tags: ,
Apr
03
2009
5

hi, we’re iowa, vanguard of equal rights in america. and you are…?

so here you are: a good and pious metropolitan liberal, holed up in your coastal ivory tower and luxuriating in the smell of your own cinnamon-scented farts, when your 3G mobile device tells you that one of those vowel states (”iowa”…is that the one with the potatoes?) is now one of only three in the nation that recognize same-sex marriage. facebook awaits your input. what to do, what to do? can you suppress the urge to belittle everything and everyone that isn’t within fifteen minutes of an apple store long enough to celebrate a historic achievement for equality and social justice? or do you take the opportunity to reference cow-tipping?

because blogging would be dreary and pointless if there wasn’t always something to bitch about, my jubilation over the varnum decision from this morning has been tempered a little (not much) by the persistent tone of know-nothing urban provincialism on display in the blurted remarks of some (not many) friends-of-friends in online chatter today. by way of illustration, a few comments overheard in the outer realms of facebookistan and twittervania over the last few hours:

“really? iowa??”
“wow, who would have thought Iowa?”
“You find common sense in the strangest places sometimes.”
“I never thought I’d have a reason to say “Go Iowa” – or even *think* about Iowa for that matter…”
“really, have you been to Iowa… besides cow tipping and corn picking – marriage is the most interesting thing to do – now everyone can. yay.”

let’s not even bother trying to plumb the depths of condescension and mock-astonishment among the NY and DC-based national media, who swallowed the red state/blue state kool aid years ago. suffice it to say, at this moment the number of heads exploding in the east village and the castro over the idea that whitebread cornfed little iowa has done what new york and california couldn’t do is at least equal to the number of heads exploding in sioux city and urbandale over the visual of two dudes making out in tuxes.

to help our urban betters wrap their huge enlightened heads around today’s news, here’s a brief history lesson. turns out iowa has a long tradition of progressive action, including but not limited to landmark legislation and court decisions, on civil rights and equality for minorities.

1839 – state supreme court, in one of the first such rulings anywhere, says a fugitive slave becomes free by setting foot on the free soil of iowa
1851 – iowa becomes the second state (after pennsylvania in 1780) to repeal racial anti-miscegenation laws
1868 – racial segregation banned from iowa schools 86 years before Brown and nearly a century ahead of the Civil Rights Act
1869 – first state to allow women to practice law
1873 – supco rules against racially segregated transportation & public accommodations
1948 – first lunch counter sit-ins of the civil rights movement, 12 years before Nashville and 7 years before Rosa Parks and the Montgomery bus boycott. Iowa supco rules against the Katz Drug Store in Des Moines, ending its policy of refusing service to blacks

is this whole post an overdetermined reaction to what were admittedly only a handful of off-the-cuff remarks by people i don’t even know? perhaps. am i defensive about this stuff? you’re goddamn right i am. i hear it all the time from people — liberals — who should know better. as far as i’m concerned, today is a victory for the long-maligned flyover as much as for gay couples.

Written by josh in: Iowa, gloating, justice, midwest |
Apr
03
2009
3

wearing my ‘native’ shirt proudly today

with this morning’s supreme court ruling, iowa becomes the first non-coastal state to recognize same-sex marriage, one of only three in the nation (after prop 8 ) where gay couples enjoy the same rights as straight couples.

Richard Socarides, a former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton on gay civil rights, said today’s decision could set the stage for other states. Socarides was was a senior political assistant for Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin in the early 1990s.

“I think it’s significant because Iowa is considered a Midwest sate in the mainstream of American thought,” Socarides said. “Unlike states on the coasts, there’s nothing more American than Iowa. As they say during the presidential caucuses, ‘As Iowa goes, so goes the nation.’”

i don’t know about “nothing more american,” but judging from the last two elections we seem to be a pretty good bellwether of mainstream political sentiment. it’s worth remembering that this was a judicial ruling and not a legislative or popular movement; iowans as a whole may not be standing up to demand equality, but at the same time i’ll be surprised if the backlash is as loud or as ugly as it would have been ten or even five years ago. at any rate, it’s heartening to think that equal rights can no longer be considered strictly a new england & san francisco thing. not to mention that our tourism industry could use the boost!

oh yeah, and the “varnum” in “varnum v. brien”? that’s my cousin kate and her now-legally-recognized spouse trish. are we proud of them? just a little.

Written by josh in: Iowa, equal rights, justice, midwest |
Apr
03
2009
1

Iowa Supreme Court Supports Civil Unions for All Citizens

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/wfData/files/Varnum/40209Varnumsummary.pdf

Des Moines, April 3, 2009— In a unanimous decision, the Iowa Supreme Court
today held that the Iowa statute limiting civil marriage to a union between a man
and a woman violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution.
The decision strikes the language from Iowa Code section 595.2 limiting civil
marriage to a man and a woman. It further directs that the remaining statutory
language be interpreted and applied in a manner allowing gay and lesbian
people full access to the institution of civil marriage.

Thank you for doing what’s right and just. This legal system might just work after all. Now if we can get the politicians to leave their church out of the state, this might just stand. Heck, Obama is getting rid of nukes too! We might just exist as a human race for a bit longer!

Written by charlie in: Civil Unions, Iowa |

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes