<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Empathy for Wingnuts (?!?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stickybuffalo.com/2009/empathy-for-wingnuts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stickybuffalo.com/2009/empathy-for-wingnuts</link>
	<description>Belaboring the Obvious Since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray</title>
		<link>http://www.stickybuffalo.com/2009/empathy-for-wingnuts#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stickybuffalo.com/?p=341#comment-240</guid>
		<description>A couple of comments on my own post:
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. Obviously, I&#039;m being overly simplistic here, both in my opening perspective and the one I lay out here.  There&#039;s tons more going on here.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;2. This may be completely obvious to everybody (it was just an idle thought for me), but I think it warrants being made explicit.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;3. My own optimism is almost entirely buried by my dread.  I&#039;m not at all confident that Obama&#039;s trust in Geithner is justified, and I&#039;m not at all convinced that they&#039;re not just making things worse.  I really don&#039;t know what to think; I&#039;m completely ignorant of this stuff.  On the one hand, Krugman&#039;s a smart guy and knows WAY more about this stuff than I do.  On the other hand, Krugman has been nursing an apparent grudge against Obama for a couple of years now, and his area of specialization isn&#039;t particularly relevant to the domestic economic crisis (from what I can tell).  So, I dunno. But I suspect that, if certain so-called &quot;moderate&quot; Democrats in the Senate didn&#039;t need to have their egos stroked, Obama&#039;s plan would be a lot better than the Geithner/Summers plan.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of comments on my own post:</p>
<div>
</div>
<div>1. Obviously, I&#8217;m being overly simplistic here, both in my opening perspective and the one I lay out here.  There&#8217;s tons more going on here.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>2. This may be completely obvious to everybody (it was just an idle thought for me), but I think it warrants being made explicit.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>3. My own optimism is almost entirely buried by my dread.  I&#8217;m not at all confident that Obama&#8217;s trust in Geithner is justified, and I&#8217;m not at all convinced that they&#8217;re not just making things worse.  I really don&#8217;t know what to think; I&#8217;m completely ignorant of this stuff.  On the one hand, Krugman&#8217;s a smart guy and knows WAY more about this stuff than I do.  On the other hand, Krugman has been nursing an apparent grudge against Obama for a couple of years now, and his area of specialization isn&#8217;t particularly relevant to the domestic economic crisis (from what I can tell).  So, I dunno. But I suspect that, if certain so-called &#8220;moderate&#8221; Democrats in the Senate didn&#8217;t need to have their egos stroked, Obama&#8217;s plan would be a lot better than the Geithner/Summers plan.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

