Multiple choice
Let’s say, just hypothetically speaking, that rising oil prices cross the arbitrary discomfort threshold for Americans, again, in 2011 and return to the forefront of what passes for our national conversation.
Which of the following responses seem likely?
- “Let’s spend even more money on various boondoggles like ethanol, shale oil or converting coal into liquid fuel.”
- “Drill, baby, drill!”
- “How did all our oil end up underneath those damn Arabs’ desert Latin Americans’ dirt?”
- “It’s China’s fault! We need to get tough with those Chinese, already!”
- “WAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! Someone fix this!! Why isn’t the government fixing this??!!?” etc., and other expressions of a generalized infantile tantrum.
- “Wow, apparently oil really is a finite resource which doesn’t just go on gushing out of the ground forever, after all, and we should have ignored the reassurances of Republicans, car companies and oil executives and instead actually listened to all those liberals, progressives, environmentalists, sandalistas, greens, treehuggers, peakers and smelly old granola-eating hippies instead of dismissing their warnings and suggestions as ‘Chicken Little’ whining.”
I wonder whether PolitiFact and other such sanctimonious “fact check” features will ever get around to addressing this matter, eh? I’ll not hold my breath.