Jun
01
2011
0

Iowa caucus fist-bump

Vexing Iowa City blogger Wil Wilkinson has taken to The Economist‘s Democracy in America blog to post a defiant and stirring defense of Iowa’s (and New Hampshire’s) much-ballyhooed special status in American politics. Some of the choice bits:

Why should lily-white podunskville states dotted with villages and hamlets and burgs, and not a single “real” city, wield such wildly disproportionate power to pick the leader of the free world? [Speaking] for us Iowans, we’re a little tired of this, if you don’t mind us saying so. Why should California have so much good weather? Why isn’t Puerto Rico a state? Why is GDP per capita in these United States higher than it is in Guatemala by a factor of 15?

Also splendid is his reply to critics who noted that this situation “represents a deviation from the democratic ideal of ‘one person, one vote.’” Per WW:

Sure, sure. As does a little something we call “the Senate”, and that mysterious but nevertheless incalculably precious institution known as “the electoral college”

Ah, this guy. When I don’t want to scream in frustration, I want to buy him a beer. In this case it’s the latter. I think, anyway; it’s tough to find the precise division amidst his remarks between sincerity and tongue-in-cheek irony, but I’m pretty sure that the main point is an honest opinion.

If it’s just slightly conflicted, well, so is my own; I suppose that if it were up to me I would just have all presidential primaries on one day, like with the actual election, just as if it were up to me I would reform the Senate and the Electoral College and etc., etc., so on so forth ad nauseum. (more…)

Jan
20
2009
0

rambling, self-indulgent inaugural musings

i woke up this morning to the sound of birds singing outside the window. no shit — birds. i’m trying hard not to find undue significance in every little thing i see today, but it’s seven degrees. nothing should be alive out there, much less creatures capable of making music.

has it only been a year since we sat in that booth at the brewpub, waiting for obama’s iowa caucus victory speech to begin?

it had been a day like this one, bright and clear and cold as hell. night had fallen hard, and early, as it does this time of year. amy and i were still warming our fingers and toes after the trek across town from our caucus location. it was amy’s first iowa caucus, and she still wore the sticker numbered “1,” proof  she was first in the door out of the hundreds who at our precinct, and a mark of pride for a newly registered Democrat. as we learned over the next few days, she was one of thousands statewide who’d attended their first party caucus, pushing turnout numbers to all-time record heights. this was no surprise, based on what we’d seen in our neighborhood: a veritable riot of twenty- and thirty-somethings, absolutely on fire for barack obama. i had seen enough caucuses to know something was up.

charlie arrived shortly and settled into a beer. he gave a similar account of his precinct across town. rubbing our hands together and sipping pints of OCBW honey hemp ale, the three of us sat there watching the results and pondering the meaning of it all.

this time last year, i wasn’t an obamaphile. i had generally favorable impressions of the guy, sure, but i was still holding fast to that skeptical-pessimist posture we’d all learned to adopt, like whipped puppies, over the past seven years of bitter experience. who the hell was this dude, anyway? i wanted to believe that the smart antiwar candidate whose buttons adorned the backpacks of my favorite students was viable. but this wasn’t 2000 or 2004, and i was in no mood to dick around with another pyhrric victory of a doomed-liberal campaign. even with the tentative victories of ’06, the wounds were still too fresh.

that uncertainty was echoed by a friend we ran into at the caucus, a long-suffering lefty of our parents’ generation who’d “been burned too many times” by charismatic and impressive Democratic leaders who tended either to become corrupt and ineffective over time, or to be assassinated before ever getting the chance. her perspective lent a sad poignancy to the spectacle of the political neophytes who surrounded us that night, too hopped up on optimism and adrenaline to even fathom the outcome that seemed most likely to us at the time — another humiliation for progressives, and a white house ultimately occupied by, if not a republican, then another weasely self-serving empty suit of a democrat who would continue carrying out bush’s disastrous policies from sheer inertia. still, it was hard not to be a little intoxicated by all that energy, unexpected as it was, not to wonder in the back of the mind: what if?

i wish i could say i allowed myself to get swept up in the obama movement then and there, but it took a couple more months. the only outcome i had hoped for on caucus night was a decisive defeat of hillary clinton, who struck me as exactly the kind of pro-war, corporatist political parasite who would guarantee another four years of the odious status quo. (i needn’t have worried; at our precinct, at least, hillary didn’t even reach viability, her supporters all but laughed out of the auditorium with zero delegates to show for their troubles.) throughout 2007 i’d been more or less equally impressed by obama, edwards, richardson and biden, and was prepared to caucus for obama if it came down to a close contest between him and clinton. but i also liked john edwards’ message and wanted to see him stay in the primary race a while longer, so when the register poll that week showed obama with a strong lead it seemed safe to caucus for edwards. (i’ve since come to regret that support, not because i give a shit about his pissant marital infidelities, but because of his monstrous act of political malpractice — when i think about the fact that he would’ve allowed himself to be the democratic nominee in 2008 knowing that bombshell could drop at any time and blow the whole election, i could kick the bastard’s teeth in.)

 back at the brewpub, watching the coverage and comparing notes with friends reporting in from other precincts, a picture was emerging: the obama thing was bigger than we’d thought. he wasn’t just winning decisively among the same old caucus stalwarts who dutifully pull on heavy coats and boots every four januaries and trudge out into the night to pick a candidate. obama was driving huge turnout among new, never-followed-politics-before voters. lots of them. that was my first inkling that in some ways maybe it didn’t matter who barack obama was or what he stood for; the important thing, the interesting thing, was the movement he represented. the people who’d been primed for politicization by a decade of republican farce and atrocity and were just waiting to be mobilized.

more precincts reports rolled in, interspersed with bemused commentary on the evening’s proceedings on the GOP side — miserable attendance, and a surge of support for mike huckabee, of all people. you could almost feel the collective shrug as the room’s attention drifted back to what was obviously the Real Story. we ordered another pitcher. charlie fiddled with his iPod, trying to pull down county-by-county numbers from the pitiful wifi signal that would waft into the pub from time to time. edwards and clinton, in turn, each marched out and delivered chipper concessions, eagerly looking forward to new hampshire.

by the time obama took the stage, there was silence throughout the bar. people on their way out stopped and stood there in their winter coats, listening. i don’t remember much of what he said, but the way he said it and the way his crowd responded was like nothing i’d ever seen before. the word “alchemy” comes to mind. i’d heard he was good, even seen him work a crowd in iowa city the year before, but this was something altogether singular to behold. and it hit me like a frying pan to the head.

“he’s going to win,” i said, twisting around in the booth to see amy and charlie. “he’s going to be president.” it wasn’t  a prediction. it was a sudden jolt of crystal-clear perception, spoken with the slack-jawed guilelessness of one who has just processed the punchline to a joke told five minutes earlier. a simple extrapolation of facts and processes already in motion: right time, right place, right guy. and he was simply too smart and competent to fuck it up.

there followed several weeks of campaign sturm and drang, during which my impressions of obama as a political supergenius grew stronger, though i still withheld judgment as to whether this was necessarily a good thing. for a while there i suppose i rooted for him more out of animosity toward hillary clinton, who had morphed before our eyes from an unreliable, underprincipled and entitled but otherwise more-or-less capable leader, into nothing short of a political horror show.

but that’s water under the bridge. obama made a believer of me in march, when i heard the “a more perfect union” speech — an epiphany already well documented here. a few other moments from the campaign stand out… the feeling i had, watching the speech in berlin, that it might soon be possible once again to venture out into the world with a U.S. passport and my head held high. the calm and reason he exuded amidst the abject panic of september’s bank implosions. the people i met while out door-knocking in godforsaken flooded-out little post-farm-economy towns and shitty section-8 apartment buildings along the highway, or humping voter registration forms up and down the ped mall. and the eyeball-popping euphoria of election night, after ohio was called… all indelible memories. but this morning, watching the inaugural festivities on TV, wishing i was there in the capitol freezing my ass off with ben and the gajillions of others who are witnessing this moment firsthand, it’s last january that’s on my mind. it’s cold — ungodly, unmercifully cold — but spring is coming.

happy new year, america! i love you all.

Apr
18
2008
0

time to shit or get off the pot

enough of this crap.

howard dean is right: we have to get on with it and nominate a candidate already. neither clinton nor obama can reach the magic number of pledged delegates before the convention, and nobody benefits from more of what we saw wednesday night except the GOP. superdelegates, it’s time to pick your pony.

i’m writing letters to the uncommitted democratic supers from my state urging them to grow a pair and help bring an end to this absurdity. find yours here. feel free to use my letter as a template:

Dear [hesitant super]:

As you know, DNC Chair Howard Dean has asked Democratic superdelegates to publicly commit to a candidate as soon as possible. I share his concern that the drawn-out nomination fight we are witnessing, with its increasingly negative tone and focus on increasingly trivial, non-substantive issues, is damaging the party’s prospects in November, to the benefit of neither candidate – nor, still less, that of the American people. With each day of ugly and pointless infighting it becomes clearer that to continue in this vein can only help John McCain.

As an Iowa Democrat, I am writing to urge you to act immediately on Chairman Dean’s request and make your choice of candidate known without further delay. Under the circumstances, I can see no valid reason why automatic delegates representing states that have already voted should continue to withhold their endorsements.

As a Barack Obama supporter, I would naturally welcome your endorsement of my candidate – especially since, as you are well aware, Senator Obama carried the Iowa Caucuses by a decisive margin. More than anything else, though, I am anxious to see a swift resolution to the nomination contest, regardless of which candidate is chosen, so that we may move on to focus on the far more important goal of ending Republican control of the executive branch.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter. I look forward to your prompt endorsement of either candidate.

this has gone on far too long — i can’t wait until august. at this point, my desire to see an end to this inane nomination fight has all but surpassed my desire to see barack obama on the ticket. if he’s the nominee, i’ll volunteer for his campaign, donate money, pimp him insufferably to everybody i know, whatever. if it’s hillary, i’ll hold my nose and vote (seriously — any nominal progressive who threatens to vote mccain if their guy/gal loses deserves nothing but ridicule). but it might not matter either way if this shit isn’t resolved soon.

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes